黑料不打烊

Skip to content

Inequalities in securing equitable access to, and success in, higher education (HE) remain deeply rooted and pervasive in every country. The World Access to Higher Education Network鈥檚 report shows that progress has been made over time, but gains are fragile and uneven. Students from low-income and marginalised backgrounds remain persistently underrepresented in HE. However, universities still lack understanding of who is missing out on the benefits of HE. Among those most excluded are the growing number of forcibly displaced people, who are . In response to this, The Open University UK (OU) launched the as a tangible expression of solidarity. This blog post draws on our research within this programme to offer insights on how such programmes can extend access and success in HE for students from refugee backgrounds (SfRBs).

In contexts of forced displacement, HE is seen as supporting hope, personal and collective aspirations, and livelihoods (). For most forced migrants, however, HE remains largely due to such systemic as financial constraints and hostile policies. Several UK universities and international initiatives provide scholarships to displaced people. Many require campus attendance. The OU, as a distance learning university is distinct. Since 2022 the programme has awarded 46 scholarships to UK-based SfRBs for undergraduate degree programmes.

As universities, we have grown comfortable measuring commitment to education in metrics such as how many scholarships are granted and how many SfRBs enrol. But these tell us almost nothing about whether the students who have been failed by the education system are being reached and supported. Being actively involved in the OU programme at its outset, we view 鈥榚ntry鈥 as a key milestone, albeit one that signifies only the beginning of a sometimes very long journey. Similar to others (see for example ; ), we question the assumption that once SfRBs are 鈥榞ranted鈥 access, they will then be able to move in, through and out of HE in a linear and predictable step-by-step process. To avoid 鈥榮tuck places鈥 (), it is crucial that we pay attention not only to what we teach but importantly to how we teach: inclusively, flexibly, plurally, relationally. However, SfRBs pedagogy in HE is an under researched area that merits greater attention if we are to do more than pay lip service to inclusivity.

鈥楾o avoid 鈥渟tuck places鈥, it is crucial that we pay attention not only to what we teach but importantly to how we teach: inclusively, flexibly, plurally, relationally.鈥

In our 2023 study 鈥 we sought to understand how SfRBs navigated being newcomer learners in distance HE and how the programme was carried out. We took a multistakeholder approach to offer an empirically informed study from the perspective of students, tutors, academics, professional services and senior leadership. We took this approach because is not only about supporting individual students but requires transforming institutional culture.

The research offered rich qualitative insights into the impoverished living conditions, high levels of uncertainty about the future, and limited social networks of many of our displaced students, often leading to isolation and lack of support. Digital poverty, rigid academic processes and timelines, and non-familiarity with both English for academic purposes and distance learning, all affected progress. Students appreciated the accessibility and variety of materials provided, and the flexibility of studying at a distance, including being able to combine studies, work and caring responsibilities.

Supporting students to forge connections and/or interact with staff emerged as a critical aspect of success in making the transition to HE. Students stressed the value of having direct contact and being able to reach out to a trusted individual/team, including their tutors. Relational work and relational pedagogies (), namely centring connections and relationships, and treating SfRBs as students who matter and are valued within our institutions (), helped tutors recognise and respond to student needs, and anticipate issues that may arise.

鈥榃hen the university experience is framed in terms of firm boundaries and rigid processes, this poses additional challenges to students from refugee backgrounds.鈥

The relational aspect of teaching and learning in HE is not a new idea (see for example ). What is new is the necessitating universities to consider value-based approaches and equitable practices that shape the experiences that SfRBs have as they engage with university life. Developing robust research-informed relational pedagogies for the displaced is certainly an area that deserves more attention. Our study found that when the university experience is framed in terms of firm boundaries and rigid processes, this poses additional challenges to SfRBs. When the university experience is framed in terms of weaving vibrant and supportive social connections and relations into day-to-day online operations between key stakeholders, it can help to build meaningful points of connection and care within our institutions and not just access at the point of entry.